On 7 February 2025, President Prabowo Subianto signed Government Regulation No. 6 of 2025, amending PP No. 37 of 2021 on the Implementation of the Job Loss Insurance (Jaminan Kehilangan Pekerjaan or JKP) Program. The regulation came as Indonesia was recording one of its steeper waves of mass layoffs in recent years, driven by pressure from global economic uncertainty, the acceleration of automation in labor-intensive manufacturing, and a government efficiency drive that affected contractors and vendors across sectors.
The headline change is substantial. Workers who are laid off now receive 60 percent of their last reported wage, paid consistently for up to six months. The previous structure paid 45 percent for the first three months, then dropped to 25 percent for the final three. That tiered reduction created a gap precisely when a terminated worker most needed stability: after the immediate shock of job loss but before they had secured new employment.
For employers, the picture is more nuanced. The benefit improvement is funded partly through a reduction in the JKP contribution rate, from 0.46 percent to 0.36 percent, and partly through a reallocation of existing JKK (Work Accident Insurance) contribution funding and central government allocation. In nominal terms, the company’s monthly payroll cost for JKP goes down. But the structural obligations around accurate wage reporting, contribution timeliness, and PKWT classification have become more consequential, not less, under the new framework.
What Changed in the Benefit Structure
The core change under Pasal 21 of PP 6/2025 is the flattening of the cash benefit rate. Where the old tier structure rewarded early re-employment by tapering benefits after month three, the new structure provides the same rate throughout the entire claim period. A laid-off worker who takes five months to find a new position receives the same monthly support as one who finds a role in month two. The government made this change explicitly to provide more reliable financial security during what it acknowledged is an increasingly difficult labor market.
The benefit structure under PP 6/2025:
- Months 1 through 6: 60 percent of the last reported monthly wage, paid by BPJS Ketenagakerjaan
- Wage ceiling for calculation: IDR 5 million per month. A worker earning IDR 8 million receives a monthly JKP payment of IDR 3 million (60 percent of IDR 5 million), not IDR 4.8 million. This ceiling has remained unchanged from the prior regulation.
- Non-cash benefits: Access to job market information through the SIAPkerja platform and access to skills training programs through BPJS Ketenagakerjaan’s partner institutions continue as before, though the scope of available training programs has been expanded.
The practical consequence of the wage ceiling is that JKP functions as meaningful income replacement for workers in the low-to-middle wage band and as partial compensation for higher-earning employees. A director earning IDR 25 million per month receives the same IDR 3 million monthly benefit as an operator earning IDR 5 million. For companies with predominantly high-wage workforces, the JKP benefit is a relatively small fraction of pre-termination income, but it is not the company’s financial obligation to pay. BPJS Ketenagakerjaan disburses the benefit directly to the former employee.
Explore Our Services HR Administration in Indonesia
Eligibility: Who Qualifies Under PP 6/2025
The eligibility criteria for JKP benefits have not changed structurally, but understanding them correctly is important because misclassifying which employees qualify affects how companies communicate the benefit during termination negotiations.
A worker qualifies for JKP benefits when all of the following conditions are met:
- They are registered as a participant in the BPJS Ketenagakerjaan program
- They have made contributions to JKP for at least 12 months within the 24-month period immediately before the layoff or end of employment
- They have experienced a Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (PHK), a termination initiated by the employer for qualifying reasons
- They are not in a situation explicitly excluded under Pasal 20 of PP 6/2025, including voluntary resignation, retirement, permanent disability, or death
The PKWT Worker Limitation
One of the more consequential limitations in PP 6/2025, flagged by the House of Representatives and labor advocates in early 2025, is the treatment of fixed-term contract (PKWT) workers. Under the regulation, PKWT employees are eligible for JKP benefits only if they are terminated mid-contract by the employer. A PKWT employee whose contract simply expires at its natural end date is not eligible for JKP, because the end of the contract is not classified as a PHK under Indonesian labor law. This distinction means that the majority of PKWT workers, whose contracts are designed to run to their completion without early termination, fall outside the JKP benefit in practice.
For PT PMA entities that employ a significant proportion of fixed-term workers, this limitation means the workforce segment most vulnerable to economic fluctuation receives the least protection from the JKP framework. Companies in manufacturing, hospitality, and project-based sectors where PKWT usage is high should incorporate this limitation into their workforce planning communications rather than creating expectations that JKP will cover all categories of departed workers equally.
The broader interaction between PKWT and PKWTT employment types, including how Indonesian law governs the maximum duration of fixed-term contracts, the compensation payable at contract completion, and the conditions under which a PKWT relationship can be terminated early, is addressed in the complete guide to employment contract types in Indonesia, which covers how these distinctions affect both JKP eligibility and severance calculations.
The New Article 39A: What It Means When Companies Cannot Pay
The most significant new provision for employers in PP 6/2025 is Article 39A, which did not exist in the prior framework. It establishes a protection mechanism specifically for the scenario that has become increasingly common during economic contractions: a company that has been laying off workers while behind on its BPJS contributions.
Article 39A provides that if a company is declared bankrupt or closes in accordance with applicable law, and has unpaid JKP contributions for a period of up to six months, BPJS Ketenagakerjaan will still pay the JKP benefits to the affected workers. The employer’s obligation to pay the outstanding contributions and any applicable penalties remains in full. BPJS steps in to protect workers from the consequences of the employer’s non-payment, then pursues the employer or its estate for recovery.
This provision has two practical consequences for employers operating in financial stress.
First, it removes the perverse incentive that previously existed for financially distressed companies to quietly terminate employees before formalizing insolvency proceedings. Previously, terminated workers from an insolvent company that had fallen behind on contributions might find themselves outside the JKP system entirely, even if they met all other eligibility criteria. Under Article 39A, up to six months of arrears do not disqualify the worker from claiming.
Second, and more directly for HR and payroll teams at functioning companies, Article 39A makes clear that arrear contributions do not disappear. The BPJS recovery mechanism for employer arrears is active and systematic. A company that accumulates JKP contribution shortfalls, even if temporarily covered under Article 39A in a distress scenario, carries an enforceable liability. This reinforces the importance of maintaining current BPJS contribution payments as a priority obligation rather than one that can be deferred when cash is tight.
The contribution arrear consequences and how they interact with the company’s broader BPJS compliance standing, including the impact on work permit renewals and government licensing, are addressed in the BPJS registration and compliance guide for foreign companies in Indonesia, which covers the penalty structure and administrative consequences of delayed BPJS payments.
The Contribution Rate Change and What It Actually Means
Under PP 6/2025, the total JKP contribution rate decreases from 0.46 percent to 0.36 percent of the employee’s reported monthly wage. The government has structured this reduction so that no additional employer contribution is required. The increased benefit cost is funded through a reallocation of a portion of the JKK (Jaminan Kecelakaan Kerja, or Work Accident Insurance) contribution, which carries its own government-backed component, and through direct central government funding.
For payroll calculation purposes, the 0.36 percent rate is applied to the employee’s reported wages with no salary ceiling on JKP contributions. The total contribution is borne entirely by the employer. The employee pays nothing toward JKP directly.
One compliance implication of this rate change: companies whose payroll systems, BPJS calculation templates, or HR software were configured with the 0.46 percent JKP rate need to update those configurations. A company still calculating JKP contributions at the old rate is overpaying, and while BPJS does not typically flag overpayments as an enforcement priority, the discrepancy will accumulate in the company’s BPJS ledger and may require adjustment during an audit cycle.
For XPND clients whose payroll is managed by the XPND team, this rate adjustment was implemented in the February 2025 payroll cycle following the PP’s signature. For companies managing payroll in-house, verifying that the JKP rate in the payroll system reflects 0.36 percent is a current-year compliance check that should be confirmed before the next BPJS audit or WLKP submission.
What the Claim Process Looks Like From the Employer Side
When a termination occurs and a former employee intends to claim JKP benefits, the employer’s responsibility does not end at the moment the termination is formalized. Several steps require employer action to enable the claim to proceed.
The employer must:
- Confirm that the employee’s BPJS Ketenagakerjaan membership status is active and that contributions are current at the time of termination
- Issue the termination documentation required by Indonesian labor law, including the written termination notice, the bipartite negotiation record (if applicable), and the release and discharge letter (akta perjanjian bersama) if the termination was settled by agreement
- Ensure the last reported wage in the BPJS system reflects the employee’s actual final wage. If the reported wage has not been updated to account for recent salary increases, the JKP benefit will be calculated on the outdated figure, which benefits neither the employee nor the company’s standing with BPJS
Former employees submit their JKP claim through the SIAPkerja platform or through BPJS Ketenagakerjaan’s service channels. The claim window requires a waiting period of six months from the termination date before the benefit payment commences, compared to the three-month waiting period under the prior regulation. This longer waiting period has been the subject of criticism from labor advocates, who argue it creates an extended income gap for workers who need immediate support. From the employer’s perspective, the extended waiting period is a background condition that affects how employees perceive the JKP benefit’s usefulness relative to severance negotiation.
The severance framework under PP 35/2021, including how JKP benefits interact with and run separately from severance obligations, is addressed in the Indonesia severance pay calculation guide for the Omnibus Law era, which clarifies that JKP payments do not offset the company’s severance liability.
Three Compliance Actions Employers Should Take Now
PP 6/2025 took effect in February 2025. Companies that have not yet reviewed their JKP-related processes in light of the changes should address three areas.
Verify the JKP contribution rate in payroll calculations
Confirm that the system is calculating at 0.36 percent, not the prior 0.46 percent. If the rate has not been updated, calculate the accumulated overpayment since February 2025 and initiate an adjustment with BPJS Ketenagakerjaan.
Confirm wage reporting currency in BPJS
The JKP benefit is calculated on the last wage reported to BPJS. Companies that have given salary increases to employees without updating the BPJS reported wage are underreporting the contribution base and also creating a lower benefit baseline for those employees in the event of a future layoff. Annual or periodic wage updates in the BPJS system should be part of the payroll compliance calendar, not a one-time setup.
Update termination documentation templates and employee communications
If the company’s standard termination documentation or HR policy materials reference the old JKP benefit structure (45 percent for three months, then 25 percent), those materials need updating. Communicating the correct benefit to departing employees, both as accurate information and as a demonstration of the company’s compliance posture, reduces the likelihood of disputes arising from misinformation about what the employee is entitled to.
XPND’s payroll and HR administration team manages BPJS contribution processing, wage reporting updates, and termination compliance documentation for PT PMA clients, ensuring that the JKP changes under PP 6/2025 are reflected correctly in both the monthly payroll cycle and the employee documentation framework.
Reach out to XPND’s HR compliance team to confirm that your JKP contribution rate, BPJS wage reporting, and termination documentation are aligned with the PP 6/2025 framework before your next BPJS audit cycle.